QUIZ: Ratings, Reviews, Hot Air…and Informed Patients

July 29, 2009 in Healthcare, reform | Comments (1)

Tags: , , , , ,

This morning I browsed through the “Coming Soon” section of MSN Movies and was surprised to see that, although no movie had a critic’s rating yet (due to no pre-screenings on which to base one), each one had at least one—and sometimes dozens—of user ratings.

In fact, The Time Traveler’s Wife had a user review! What was it based on? Nothing but the book and a 2 minute long trailer. Hey, if you want to write a book review, go to Amazon.com. If you want to rate or review a movie, watch it. Simple concept, no?

But speaking of Amazon.com, I was relieved to note while browsing their New Releases that user ratings aren’t allowed until the book is actually released (or advanced release copies are distributed). That stops a lot of clueless editorializing, but unfortunately not all of it.

Joining in the online discussion on a recent Dick Francis novel I just finished, a reader rebuffed my critique. It wasn’t until days later that the reader posted an update that basically said, “Now that I’ve read the whole book, I agree with you.” What? Why are you discussing a whole book when you’ve only read a chapter or two? Just to create noise and feel a part of things?

Sadly, anyone who looks only at the average ratings or reviews on these sites has no idea many of the individual ratings that comprise it are baseless. So it is with the healthcare reform debate.

Where Is The Patient?

So what does all of this have to do with the current healthcare reform climate?

Many entities have strong lobbies and position stands—the AMA, AHA, AHIP, PhRMA, California Nurses’ Association, US Chamber of Commerce, labor unions…and the list goes on. What is missing here? A single entity representing informed patients. Isn’t healthcare, and especially healthcare reform, supposed to be all about The Patient?

Yes, there are multiple groups representing some patients—MoveOn.org, Campaign For America’s Future, and Health Care For America Now among others. But there is no single group representing The Informed Patient. And there are plenty of uninformed individuals masquerading as patients, fear mongering and opining and talking about everything but healthcare.

Opinionated Non-Patients

For instance, a 2008 Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that those who rarely or never use their health plans are TWICE AS LIKELY to rate their private plan as excellent.

That’s not satisfaction. It’s cluelessness.

Especially when the same poll indicates 32% of respondents or a household member had difficulty paying medical bills.

Presumably it’s also non-patients who were surveyed in a June 2009 New York Times/CBS News study often quoted by AHIP President Karen Ignagni. It found:

  • 77% of Americans are satisfied with their existing health coverage
  • But in the same study 72 vs 20% of Americans also favor the creation of a public plan
  • Bottom line? Non-patients don’t know what they want because they have no experience with the existing healthcare maze.

    The Informed Patient Litmus Test

    So how do you know whether you are an Informed Patient? How do you determine whether you are entitled to assign a 5 or 1 star rating and write user reviews?

    Simple. Take this quiz:

    The Informed Patient Quiz

    1. Are you a patient (i.e., been under a healthcare provider’s care recently)?
    2. Do you have health insurance?
    2a. If No, have you read and understood a provider’s bill for services?
    2b. If Yes, have you read and understood an Explanation of Benefits for provider services?
    3a. Do you know your other health insurance plan alternatives (i.e., what you are eligible to sign up for)?
    3b. Total Premium for your insurance (including employer portion, if applicable)?
    3c. Annual Deductible?
    3d. Co-Pays and/or Co-Insurance percentages?
    3e. Annual Out of Pocket Maximum?
    3f. Lifetime Maximum Benefit?
    4. Do you know how to determine In-Network vs. Out-of-Network providers?
    5. Do you know which services are covered under your health plan?

    Grade The Quiz

    If you answered “No” to #1 or #2a or #2b, you are not an Informed Patient. In fact, if you answered no to #1 and #2, please don’t complain about any requirements to become insured. Get smart before you become intimately acquainted with bankruptcy and wage garnishment.

    If you answered “Yes” to two of the three questions #1, #2a, #2b, you are a Patient. If you answered “Yes” to all the remaining questions, congratulations, you passed! You are an Informed Patient.

    For those that didn’t pass? Please shut your mouth.

    Because if you’re not an Informed Patient, you have no opinion. Pure and simple. You may have bought the product, you may sell or service the product. But if you don’t use it, you have no valid opinion in the healthcare reform debate and no right to be counted—you are either originating or propagating stereotypes and propaganda.

    And to those Informed Patients out there?  Carry on and don’t let the powers that be water down your healthcare reform. You use it, you depend on it. Call your representatives today.

    ©2009, Actively Fused LLC


    One Response to “QUIZ: Ratings, Reviews, Hot Air…and Informed Patients”

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    1. Comment by Aaron SidnerJuly 29, 2009 at 1:26 pm  

      Unfortunately, there are many out there glad to offer their opinions and even call themselves experts when they have no experience. I remember fondly watch a morning news show in which the host was interviewing a well-educated middle-aged woman from DC and a older woman from LA (didn’t claim any specific academic credentials) about the use of spanking to discipline younger children. The debate continued escalate until the woman in LA interrupted with ‘Excuse me, how many children did you say you have?’ to which the DC replied that she never had any. The host was visibly laughing as the LA woman put up her hands and declared the conversation ‘over’ and proceeded to begin unhooking her communication equipment.

      Yes, this is a long comment but I hope you see my point: THR is very logical in her assertion that those who are not actively using (not just paying premiums) their health care are simply not credible participants in this discussion. Yes, their voice should still be heard but let’s not hallucinate that their input is to be taken with equal weighting. (I think this just became a rant–please forgive my transgression!)